Disciplinary enquiry was conducted against the Reports decisions of Labour Relations Boards across Canada. 1985-2000 available in 2007- . To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com. However, case law in American prior to Hunt was mixed. New York City fails to pay its Child Protective Specialists for pre-shift, post-shift, and meal period work. in an APAR, whether good or bad grades, is a matter in respect of
Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). The High Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq.
Singhania & Partners LLP, Solicitors and Advocates Corona Virus has created an unprecedented situation having devastating impact on the finance of our country. Notification for cancellation recieved via sms message whilst in Lockdown, May2020It is wonderful that this most reminded us that it is important to ensure that the employment policy within a company covers maternity. When the City pays overtime, it fails to properly calculate the regular rate of pay and fails to timely pay overtime.This lawsuit concerns the Bureau of Prisons’ failure to comply with the FLSA by not compensating correctional workers at FCI Otisville who work certain correctional posts for regularly performed pre- and post-shift work activities. That was the question for the Court of Appeal in this case.The managing director paid for taxis to take staff to a hotel bar to continue drinking after the workplace Christmas party. An employee who is made redundant while on maternity leave has special rights relating to being offered suitable alternative work.UK law also provides that an employee who is dismissed while pregnant or on maternity leave is entitled to a written statement of reasons for the dismissal, irrespective of length of service and without having to make a request.This decision about the admissibility in employment tribunals of legal advice from employment lawyers to employers is arguably the most important procedural case of 2018.The discrimination case concerns the admissibility of an email in which a senior lawyer gave advice to the respondent company about how it could use a redundancy/restructuring programme as a “cloak” to dismiss the claimant.While legal advice is normally privileged and does not have to be disclosed in an employment tribunal, there is an exception that allows legal advice to be admissible if it has the purpose of “effecting iniquity” (ie assisting the employer in committing a wrongdoing).The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) acknowledged that, while tribunal disclosure obligations do not normally apply to documents containing legal advice, the email was admissible because it set out “not only an attempted deception of the claimant but also, if persisted in, deception of an employment tribunal in likely and anticipated legal proceedings”.HR professionals involved in discussions with employment lawyers about potential claims should be aware that, if such advice is sought or given for the purpose of effecting something underhand, the usual legal advice privilege protection may not apply.When shared parental leave was introduced, one of the biggest concerns was how much employers that enhance maternity pay should pay those on shared parental pay.Employers that enhance maternity pay had to think very carefully about whether or not to offer enhanced shared parental pay.