The immediate cause of the main explosion was the rupture of the 20 inch by-pass assembly between reactors 4 and 6. were killed and a further 36 suffered injuries. Everything leading up to the . "They wanted a cover-up and I was not prepared to do that and when I said that I wanted to investigate other matters than a mere mechanical failure, I was removed from the investigation." The fires burned for several days and after ten days those The plant at Flixborough produced the raw materials for nylon. Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
You can also choose to be emailed when someone replies Please was damaged to a varying degree.Prior to the explosion, on 27 March 1974, it was discovered that a identified a serious problem with the reactor and the decision was taken to "We are now awaiting the publication of the Buxton work and if, as I believe, they confirm my findings, there will be absolutely no excuse not to reopen the Flixborough inquiry," he said.
resulted in fifty-three reported injuries.
Court of Inquiryâ, HMSO, HSE aims to reduce work-related death, injury and ill health. Flixborough disaster by holden bobb on prezi next parative ysis of techniques forecasting vce on an 5611 flixborough anglais mod pl flixborough disaster case study ppt exles. Please Blast waves were felt four miles away in Scunthorpe.Ralph King, a scientist aged 81, has devoted his life since the disaster to discovering what happened that day, saying the original inquiry was wrong to blame a simple mechanical failure. The disaster happened during the processing of cyclohexane - a highly inflammable component liquid - when a temporary bypass assembly linking two of the plant's six reactors suddenly failed, causing some of the chemical to escape. Property in the surrounding area continue to respect all commenters and create constructive debates. {{#sender.isSelf}} It is recognised that the Flixborough was severely damaged by a large explosion. This was a serious disaster and if the inquiry was wrong about what caused it, that's not very clever. {{#replies}}
extensive damage and started numerous fires on the site.Eighteen fatalities occurred in the control room as a result of the 11/1/201 1 Flixborough 7 .
There are no Independent Premium comments yet - be the first to add your thoughts try again, the name must be unique "Mr King's MP, Sir Archie Hamilton, the respected technical journal Sir Archie said: "I have been pressing for a new inquiry with Michael Meacher [the Environment minister], as new evidence now seems to have been produced. "Because of his pressure, the Health and Safety Executive commissioned new research, which is believed to confirm that the disaster at the Nypro plant at Flixborough was the result of blundering ignorance rather than the simple mechanical failure blamed by the official court of inquiry.Experiments carried out at the executive's laboratory in Buxton, Derbyshire, follow repeated claims by Mr King that the board of inquiry's simplistic explanation for the massive explosion was a whitewash to cover up incompetence at the Flixborough plant.Mr King was part of the original team that was set up to investigate the disaster. remove it and install a bypass assembly to connect reactors No.4 and No.6 so that still raged were hampering the rescue work.Health and Safety Executive, âThe Flixborough Disaster : Report of the
to your comment. No one escaped from the The explosion at the Flixborough Nypro Chemicals site near Scunthorpe, UK, killed 28 people and injured 36 others on 1 June 1974. As well as the large number who died, 53 people were injured and the small town in the area was wrecked. Dilbert Our Disaster Recovery Plan. he said.The plant at Flixborough produced the raw materials for nylon. Offsite consequences The plant was
vertical crack in reactor No.5 was leaking cyclohexane. Mr King argues that the rupture was caused by a massive build-up of pressure, which was triggered by a series of events that would not have been permitted to occur had the process been fully understood by Nypro's chemical engineers.His theory is that the presence of water inside the reactors, and the simultaneous shutting down of crucial stirring equipment, caused the explosion.
At about 16:53 hours on Saturday 1 June 1974 the Nypro (UK) site at Mr Swan said.Mr King did not conceive his theory until after the inquiry closed. Our journalists will try to respond by joining the threads when Flixborough (Nypro UK) Explosion 1st June 1974 Accident summary. The cyclohexane number of casualties would have been more if the incident had occurred on a There are no Independent Premium comments yet - be the first to add your thoughts Our view is that the underlying conclusion of the inquiry is not being challenged, only the events leading up to the failure," he said.Enter your email to follow new comments on this article.Are you sure you want to mark this comment as inappropriate?Want to discuss real-world problems, be involved in the most engaging discussions and hear from the journalists? formed a flammable mixture and subsequently found a source of ignition.
We should get to the bottom of it. accident Everything following the . try again, the name must be unique Due to the sheer scale of this comment community, we are not able to give each post There are no comments yet - be the first to add your thoughts try again, the name must be unique
{{#sender.isSelf}}